Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Page 2 of 4

mtscott

What impact will follow-on biologics have for pharmaceutical marketers?

The answer, like most things, is “it depends.” An important question remains to be answered: Are Congress and the FDA really going to declare “interchangeability” between an innovator biologic medication and a follow-on biologic? With interchangeability, you’d have a situation much like that with most current generic drugs. Brands will have a short time to recoup costs and will be competing with generics that can be substituted by a pharmacist without the intervention of the doctor.

Just a few short years ago FDA said that it “has not determined how interchangeability can be established for complex proteins.” The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) states that “the current state of science is not sufficient to establish interchangeability for complex follow-on biologics.”

Follow-on biologics have already been approved, but not as interchangeable products
An explosion of generic drugs has resulted from the generic pathway established in 1983 by the Hatch-Waxman Act: Section 505(b)2 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (FDCA), which allows for an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA).

According to FDA Guidance for Industry: Applications Covered by Section 505(b)2, an ANDA is “an application…where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference.” In other words, the generic manufacturer can rely on published literature and the FDA’s finding that the original branded drug is safe and effective. The ANDA pathway generally does not require costly Phase III studies, but it was not written to apply to biologics.

In 2004, FDA stated that it could not reach a final decision concerning the approval of Omnitrope, a follow-on recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) manufactured by Sandoz, through the 505(b)2 ANDA process (the application used Pfizer’s Genotropin as its reference). FDA felt that it was an issue that had to be settled by Congress because there was so much uncertainty in the scientific and legal issues surrounding biologics.

A response that continues to raise more questions, years later
Ordered by a federal district court to hold a hearing on the ANDA, FDA approved Omnitrope in 2006 but issued a 53-page “decision letter” addressing petitions from Pfizer, BIO, and Genentech requesting that FDA not allow this ANDA for a biologic (protein) product. At the very beginning of the letter, FDA spells out several items that its response does NOT address, including:

  • Interchangeability—Omnitrope was designated as a “BX” generic; these are “drug products for which the data are insufficient to determine therapeutic equivalence”                            
  • Scientific issues with protein products, especially those not well-characterized by currently available analytical techniques (rhGH was considered by FDA to be “extensively and adequately characterized”)

In addition, Sandoz had conducted three original Phase III trials in pediatric patients with growth failure. So this decision did not establish a precedent.

Fast-forward five years
The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, signed into law in 2010, attempts to provide a pathway to interchangeability for biologic medications in general, despite the fact that—as far as I know—researchers have not solved the issues wisely avoided by FDA in 2006. The law as written states that the follow-on biologic must show data from “analytical studies that demonstrate that the biological product is highly similar to the reference product notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive compounds.”

For FDA to declare a follow-on biologic “interchangeable,” the manufacturer must show that “the risk in terms of safety or diminished efficacy of alternating or switching between use of the [follow-on] biologic product and the reference product [innovator or brand] is not greater than the risk of using the reference product” alone.

Follow-on = Me-too?
Right now, it seems to me that the only way to demonstrate interchangeability (lack of additional risk) would be through large, costly Phase III studies. The price of entry into manufacturing biologics is high, so the steep discounts seen for generics will not materialize (follow-on biologics could easily be 80%-90% of the price of the original). And given the fact that it may be reckless, in the current state of knowledge, to declare a follow-on biologic “interchangeable” (allowing substitution without the knowledge of the physician), will patients and physicians choose a 10% discount for a “biosimilar”?

So the situation won’t be remotely comparable to generics, if science prevails. You’ll be looking at biologics that are based on an innovator product, priced at 90% of the original, with no automatic substitution. Unlike chemical “me-toos” (new brands in a class, such as statins), follow-on biologics will not be able to promote better efficacy or safety. I think for now, biotech innovators have little to worry about, and follow-on biologic manufacturers face an uphill battle.

pdeschamps

Life lessons turned to business

Now that my kids are at the age where they are making decisions about where they want to go to college and what they want to study, I am often caught using a phrase that my father taught me about Life. He said: ” Life disproportionally rewards passion” so make sure that you study and work in something that you are passionate about and life will take care of itself.

I find myself using that line often as I teach my kids not to get stressed out about what they should study. I simply tell them study what you are passionate about and you will become better than most who are doing it because they picked it without much thought.

After one such conversation I started thinking about how I could apply this philosophy to my work. As a business leader it is easy to fall back into the mechanics of business, effectiveness, efficiency, process optimization. Not always, but often, this gets in the way of people doing what they are passionate about. This is what still drives the marketing and advertising world. I sat in on a presentation last Friday where the CEO of a company who had just chosen us to help them redesign and redeploy their worldwide brand. The CEO wanted to see the pitch presentation that won us the business. The team delivered the presentation as if we were still fighting to win. They were passionate. The CEO responded with equal passion and it was a launching pad for new ideas that were bigger and better than either of us could have come up with independently. It immediately struck me at the end of the meeting how true my fathers’ advice was. Passion makes the world go around.

I will continue to keep his advice front and center in how I manage our business. And I thank my incredible team for allowing me to see the effect of passion in real life.

dmarinacci

Top ten list for 2011 graduates

It’s that time of year (no, not rerun season) –graduation time. Time for keynote speakers reflecting on their experiences and offering advice with the hopes of molding the young minds of tomorrow; for inspiring books from family and friends with encouraging messages about a bright future. We’ve all been there. It’s a new chapter – whether it’s graduation from high school or college, the world never looked bigger or more overwhelming, especially for those in the communications and marketing field. The challenges ahead for these grads have similarities to those past and indeed include new ones to overcome – whether it’s an unpredictable economy and job market, greater competition for jobs, or the rapidly evolving communications landscape and lack of resources to make an impact – each make it difficult to focus on anything other than the smaller more precious and less daunting things in life (in other words, for many, that does not include work).

When recently reading Ragan’s Health Care Communications News, I came across this article that offers advice specifically to public relations graduates. (Great stuff from Jessica Levco). After reading it I realized I had a few thoughts of my own, some related, some not, to Jessica’s advice, and wanted to offer ten tips to the graduates of 2011:

  1. Find a mentor. This may seem like a no brainer. But try not to be intimidated. Chances are the people you admire and respect the most aren’t going to express anything other than willingness to help you learn and succeed.
  2. Never stop learning (and be curious). There has never been more information at your fingertips. Soak it in and remember that you have a responsibility to continue honing your skills and knowledge throughout your career. That’s the only way to get to the next level.
  3. Know your way around digital and social media. Or you’ll be left behind. Maybe not in your very first job, but likely in the next when social and digital are engrained in nearly every turn of your professional path.
  4. Be patient. Your passion is abundant when you first start down your professional path but remember that small steps are first needed to make big strides. And don’t run over anyone on your way there.
  5. Be respectful. See #4.
  6. Do good in the world. Whether it’s time, talents or money, find a way to fit volunteering into your schedule as part of your work/life balance. It warms the soul and helps others. A win win.
  7. Share information and knowledge. As a communicator, it should become habit to pass along great content to others whether it’s the latest research, quick tips or just something you consider shareworthy and fun. Call it playing well with others.
  8. Don’t forget how to spell. Yep, I said it. Mobile shorthand is convenient but don’t let it creep into your work or worse, make you forget about proper grammar and spelling all together. Before you know it you’ll type gr8 instead of great in that email to your boss.
  9. Embrace change. It’s an oldie but goodie. Don’t be afraid of it.
  10. Build relationships. Whether it’s with colleagues, clients or others found in social networks, make the effort. Regularly exchanging emails with your client isn’t  enough. You have the opportunity to connect to people who want to engage in coversation about a similar topic.  Get to know them. It builds trust and mutual respect and before you know it, a relationship.

The environment for communicators is changing at the speed of light. It’s both scary and exciting. But to all you recent graduates, breathe deep, have some fun, and buckle your seatbelt. Although you will face many challenges along the way, the possibilities and opportunities have never been greater.
What advice can you offer to recent grads entering the world of communications?

bnasal

What’s happening to the write stuff?

It seems to be fading away. I’m talking about the writing abilities of professional adults in the workplace. We’ve all seen the evidence of decline. We flit through e-mails with wrong words, missing words, and sloppy grammar. We read letters and reports that tax our brains as we search for clear meaning and for the information we need.

Other signs pop up in academia. Institutions of higher learning are forced to offer remedial writing courses because their incoming students can’t meet minimal acceptable standards. Fortune 500 corporations (and others) are pressuring grad schools to upgrade the writing skills of their MBA candidates. These students enter the work world poised to analyze and PowerPoint their way to success—but not ready to communicate skillfully.

Now let’s flip the coin. How’s your writing? Is it clear, focused, and logical? How’s your grammar? Does it impress your managers and your colleagues—or turn them off? And how do our clients view our communications? Let’s face it—they’re not going to be happy with shoddy e-mails and letters, with reports that don’t clearly explain research results and implications, or with proposals that are unfocused, disorganized, or unpersuasive.

What’s brought us to this point?  For decades, the US educational system has been pressing the “Delete” button when it comes to teaching the second “R” (‘Riting). Time and resources are limited, and the need to teach its siblings, Reading and ‘Rithmetic, seems more urgent—as do the needs to provide ever-wider ranges of academic courses and to prep students for statewide standardized tests. 

 Now add the corporate/investor devotion to the short-term bottom line, which precludes taking time and spending money to train employees how to communicate. Also not helpful—the warp speed at which business is forced to operate—prodded by an environment of economic uncertainty, swift-moving competition, and even faster-evolving technology. Train employees how to improve their writing? Not in this environment.  And we also can’t ignore the pervasive effects of social media/technology (a topic for another day).

 The result? Writing instruction and competence continue to fall further down the queue—reminding us that it’s hard to escape the principles of supply and demand.  As economists have long taught us, if a good, a service, or a skill isn’t being valued—and therefore demanded—it surely won’t be supplied.

dmarinacci

Is a storyteller the new brand champion?

While attending Fast Company’s Innovation Uncensored conference last week with my colleague Leigh Householder, I noticed that a particular term was mentioned more than a few times among panelists and speakers as they described the success of their brands: storytelling.

If you work in a creative environment, you know there’s certainly no shortage of brilliant minds that occupy the halls. Personally, I am often inspired by the talent who I’m proud to call my colleagues, from strategists to designers to medical writers and social media influencers. They are masters at their craft and valued as major contributors to creating the greatness that makes an agency special.

Then there is the quintessential storyteller. The lead character. The secret weapon. Someone who possesses this talent often can’t be described through a job description or title. It’s an innate quality. One that should be nurtured and appreciated on a whole new level. Certainly the art of storytelling is nothing new; it still exists in the literary world, movies, art and theater, but is it missing from business and the marketer’s tool box?

The value of good storytelling can’t really be measured in hard numbers (maybe that’s why some marketers don’t always consider it an essential component of their “arsenal”), but the impact of a good storyteller is immeasurable in my opinion. Companies/marketers who don’t position a storyteller as its brand champion are passing on the secret sauce because it’s not just about the story, but also how the story is told that matters. It’s the emotional connection the storyteller creates with the audience by using their natural ability to deliver a compelling message that not only resonates but inspires.

So why is a good storyteller so important for brands in today’s over-exposed and media-saturated environment?

>>They captivate and inspire. A good storyteller has an infectious personality. Whether it’s telling a compelling brand story or making the case for the product they’re selling, their natural ability to tell a story that inspires is hardly forgotten.

>>They create a connection. They light up a room with their passion and positive energy and often evoke an emotional reaction or connection with the audience. And isn’t that what all brands want?

>>They make messages more believable. A good storyteller has the power to translate difficult messages into crystal clear content. The storytelling process combines facts with flair and in the end delivers a compelling, believable story.

>>They are natural solution seekers. Because they see the overarching big picture, their instinct is to hone in on potential issues at it relates to the story, and offer solutions to clients.

If you have the privilege of working with good storytellers in your agency like I do, you’ve seen the impact. But if you don’t, I recommend that the next time you’re thinking about how to make your stories easier to read, listen to, understand and remember that the traditional “W’s” used by journalists (who, what, when, where and why) can sometimes benefit from being tweaked to refocus in a slightly different sense. For example, Richard Zahler of The Seattle Times suggests the following approach:

  • Who becomes the character
  • What becomes the plot
  • When becomes the chronology
  • Where becomes the setting
  • Why becomes the motivation

As much as I respect the art of journalism (most of the time anyway), I have an indescribable amount of respect for good storytellers and their craft.

What about you? Have you had the benefit or experience of being in a room with a good storyteller? Were you inspired? Did you connect with the brand story?

mtscott

Cringe-worthy ideas, memes, and topics of discussion

This month, I’ve decided to come up with a list of ideas or things that make me cringe when they’re abused, misused—or even used at all.

  1. Twitter as a valid marketing platform for pharma
    With the DDMAC ruling on Google Adwords ads that effectively killed the “one-click-away” rule for fair balance (if such a “rule” ever existed), what in the world are you going to accomplish in 140 characters. Conan? Oh, yeah. He kicked Jay Leno’s unfunny butt all over Twitter (Conan: 2.6 million followers; Leno: about half a million). But pharma? Except for Novo Nordisk’s updates from a sponsored IndyCar driver with Type 1 diabetes, I can’t think of how it could work. And nothing on the Twitter page or tweets can be branded. It’s a Twitter feed for a branded IndyCar. Great idea, and probably the closest anyone can come to branded content on Twitter. Or am I totally off-base? Let me know.
  2. QR codes; 2D barcodes
    Don’t get me wrong. QR codes are very cool, as my brilliant colleague Leigh Householder points out. Or as I’ve pointed out myself. (Actually, they’re 2D barcodes—QR codes are just one type, invented by an affiliate of Toyota in the early 90s to track shipments.) In Japan, where the QR craze started, they’re realizing that these codes aren’t all that. What do you do on TV? In busy train stations? In many ads, they’ve begun using search box mock-ups with suggested search terms, which bring up paid and natural search terms across major search engines. Even when Entertainment Weekly uses Microsoft tags to access movie previews, it can be easier to simply use Google or YouTube—or go to the movie site. Unless you’re doing augmented reality of a building in real time like this, complete with tweets from the occupants, don’t ask me to use a finicky 2D barcode app to pull up a website or streaming video.
  3. Like us on Facebook; check us out on Facebook
    What are people going to do on your Facebook page? It better be good—and I mean “something-I-couldn’t-possibly-do-on-your-website” good. And if it looks like you simply dumped your website into Facebook, don’t bother. Don’t poke me, bro.
  4. Branding as the solution for everything
    When the New Orleans murder rate was the highest per capita of any city in the developed world in 2004, and then climbed another 30% by 2007, what did city leaders do? Why, they launched an international branding campaign: “Forever New Orleans,” complete with taglines such as “Soul is Waterproof” and “New Orleans Is Open. To Just About Anything.” According to OBD: Obsessive Branding Disorder: The Illusion of Business and the Business of Illusion, “Branding is more distraction than progress. Real change results from innovation that advances knowledge and improves the quality of our lives.” It’s not that branding has no place; it’s just that not every business problem is fundamentally a branding problem. It may be a marketing or advertising problem (not the same as branding), a customer engagement issue, or a research and development problem.
  5. “Overwhelming agreement” among 6 people or so
    Among a group of 6 people, there are 20 ways in which the group could be divided 50/50 on an issue, according to The Drunkard’s Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives. But there are a total of 22 ways that the group could be 4-2, 5-1, or 6-0 in favor of your issue, and an equal number of ways they could be against it. So if you somehow knew that in the real world, people were evenly divided on the issue, there is a 2/3 chance that a focus group of 6 people will steer you wrong.

What makes you cringe? What makes you want to run out the room screaming that no one gets it? And which of my “cringe-worthy” notions am I completely mistaken about?

abrown

Thinking out of the box – with a box.

If you’ve been out and about and see a multitude of boxes that appear to be ‘tech hieroglyphics’ to you, you are most likely viewing a QR code. But don’t be fooled – there is a lot to be seen behind these seemingly random patterned graphics.

A QR code (Quick Response) is a specific matrix barcode (or 2D code), readable by dedicated QR barcode readers and camera phones. Consider it a modern day Seurat version of Pointillism – consisting of a small square of black and white blocks (which can now be customized in different colors) arranged in a square pattern that allows text, URL or other information to be encoded. In most uses, each can contain over 7,000 pieces of data, with the primary content generally linked to a mobile website/experience.

For those of you that have a QR reader, please have my ‘get out of jail free’ card for this next paragraph – if you don’t – read on. In order to access the content within a QR code, you need a QR reader on your mobile device (simple, right?). One of the most common QR code reader that works well is i-nigma, which claims to be the most widely used reader in the world. Another option (specifically for Android devices) is Barcode Scanner. Once you’ve got your app downloaded on your phone, start finding some QR codes and unleash the world around you.

Although initially used for tracking parts in vehicle manufacturing (they originated in Japan), QR codes are finding a new home in new mediums and contexts. Given the popularity and ease of use, the QR code experience is not only increasing commercial tracking but is driving more and more convenience-oriented applications within the mobile environment.

Now, if you’re like me, you see an amazing opportunity to streamline how to interact, send data and engage beyond a typical website (or desktop experience for that matter). Since the prevalence has been increasing, the integration within marketing has continued to rise, and with that – further engagement, creative exploration and most importantly, ROI. For greatest success, the QR experience needs to be seamless among all brand mediums (yes, we’re talking traditional and interactive campaigns alike – billboards, print, tradeshow experiences (in-booth and out-of-booth), etc).

When deciding to us a QR code, most of the importance (outside of ease of integration and use) is the ability to measure response rates, interaction and downloads. With these key criteria in hand, marketers can see a clearer value with their investment and ROI. Who doesn’t like real-time targeting with a measurable ROI?

  1. Some key areas of measurement include:
    1. Total number of scans for each code (and does any particular type of content get scanned more than others? If so, is there any particular reason – location, ad integration)
    2. Average number of scans per user (utilizing cookies on browsers)
    3. Number of unique users who attempt a scan
    4. Mobile device OS distribution (fueling better engagement within all potential users/platforms)

All things aside, I could go on and on about QR codes and where they’ve been, and where I think they will go – but to be honest, I think its potential is limitless. The current QR codes usage is only scratching the surface of what can happen in social environments and what is currently used in a mobile environment. So go out there, create some QR codes and unleash some creativity on the world.

dcollins

Concepting: Not Just for Creatives Anymore

We’ve heard ad nauseum about the slow death of the traditional (old) copywriter/art director teams. And there is, admittedly, much debate on the topic.

However, more and more agencies are abandoning the Bernbach-built model, and inviting people from different backgrounds to join the ideation process. In her book, The Idea Writers: Copywriting in a New Media and Marketing Era, Teressa Iezzi notes that agencies like CP+B, Ogilvy, and AKQA have all began relying on non-traditional creative teams to get ideas rolling – including people from user experience, digital strategy, motion graphic and other digital disciplines.

The copywriter/art director pairing was a stroke of genius at a time (60 years ago!) when brands needed little more than pictures and words on paper. Clearly that’s no longer the case. Our creative responsibility has shifted from informing people, to engaging them. And the web, to put it mildly, engages people.

This simple premise in mind, the question becomes when to include digital disciplines into our concepting – not if.

However, the process of doing so does present certain pitfalls.

As a copywriter, the thought of 6 people – regardless of their background – sitting at a table, trying to crack a brief is terrifying. Egos, personalities and politics have a way of destroying creativity. Concepting with that many people certainly could be productive, but it could also be very difficult – and it’s not always easy to tell the difference.

So perhaps the answer lies in viewing our creative solutions as snowballs rather than items on a conveyor belt.

At each stage of creative development – including inception – we should try to invite people from digital disciplines to join the party and remain involved throughout the life of the project. In doing so we inspire true collaboration and allow an idea to grow to such a size that two people can’t move it alone. And the bigger it gets, the more people it takes to move. Like a giant snowball, if you will.

But no positive change can come about without sacrifice. If copywriters and art directors aren’t already thinking digitally, they’re getting left behind. But they also have to be willing to share ownership of creative with people from other disciplines. Luckily, as solutions become bigger and more grandiose, so does the amount of credit to go around.

Clearly, there’s been a fundamental shift in the purpose of advertising (if you can even call it “advertising” anymore) over the last decade. And as a result, art and copy just won’t do it anymore – not alone, anyway.

The words “digital” and “creative” are quickly becoming interchangeable. And if the purpose and goals of our industry have all shifted, shouldn’t our creative method?

jjaeckel

This changes everything changes nothing.

Every so often, and more and more with each passing day, there is some innovation or revelation of a new channel or medium by which brands can engage customers.

Naturally, people in our business immediately consider the possibilities afforded by these new opportunities for expanding the reach of a brand.

Recently, one of our teams was discussing the use of QR tags and scanning software for a client trade show experience. QR Codes could be used to streamline and “modernize” the trade show experience for the client’s customers.

However, questions arose, like: “what’s the customer’s motivation for capturing that code and/or going to that web-site?”

And that’s really the age-old question, isn’t it? What’s in it for the customer?

Dating myself here, I go back to the mid-to-late 90’s (well, long before then actually) when every client and every agency echoed the same mantra: “we have to have a web-site.”

Which (sometimes, though not often enough) begged the question: “what kind of web-site?” To which, the answer was often: “I don’t know . . . a cool one!”

Today, we understand the difference between an e-commerce site or a branded web-community or myriad other kinds of web presences with myriad brand functions.

Which leads to the larger point: new channels, mediums, technologies, what have you—are all tools. A means to a hopefully better end for the brand.

Sometimes, in the mad rush to get hip to the latest innovation in channels and vehicles, we might lose sight of the challenge at hand—which might, or might not, require use of said channels. And, always, will require thinking around the broader context of the customer experience we’re trying to create.

New channels and vehicles can enhance the message. They can perhaps call for some subtle alteration of the message. But, in and of themselves, they’re not the message. And therefore not the sum total of the experience or anything close to it.

Much of the professional pharma advertising business has been built on and around the dynamics of the old school pharma rep sales call.

With the advent of the Tablet PC and iPads, PDAs and data that’s accessible online, that’s all changed.

Or has it?

Physicians still see much the same patients and deal with many of the same issues day after day.

The healthcare professional is still time-poor, skeptical and often unwilling to give the rep (or the company they represent) a “seat at the table” in terms of real clinical partnership.

What the customer wants and needs from a brand interaction—regardless of the channel—remains essentially the same: new information, surprise and delight, an “Aha!” Moment.

One of the beauties of new(er) technologies like digital sales assets is that their novelty—for a while at least—can be engaging in and of itself, and break the inertia of “been there, done that.”

And that’s good. Because in the highly-regulated, science-based world of pharma, new content is hard to come by.

A new medium can greatly enhance the message.

The key, then, to integrating new technologies, channels and vehicles is to never lose sight of the customer and what they want from brands—and choose the vehicle or channel, not because it’s new or old, but because it’s optimal for positively and memorably shaping that experience.

Time and technology march on. But customers still march to the beat of their own wants and needs.

And the brass ring is making all three seamlessly serve each other.

dstout

To rebrand or not to rebrand?

Panty hose are making a return. Maybe not to your wardrobe, but it is to your living room. That’s right, after a 14-year recess L’eggs is making its TV advertising return. So after 14 years could you still remember that slogan? … Well, how’d you do? Great if you remembered, “Nothing beats a great pair of L’eggs.” Too bad that’s not what you’ll be hearing upon the comeback. According to Media Decoder blog, L’eggs wanted to “move on, contemporize and modernize” which includes a new slogan—”You’re in luck. You’re in L’eggs.”

So I’ll give it that modernizing hosiery wouldn’t be a very easy task. Even just the word “hosiery” screams old-fashioned. Nevertheless, I’m just not sure how well this rebranding will work. The goal is to reach women 18-34, so since I land in that demographic I think my opinion counts in saying the new slogan just doesn’t do it for me. Maybe I’m just more accustomed to the heritage of that original slogan and recognizing that brand when popping open one of those egg tops when I had to borrow my mom’s pantyhose for church. Plus, what kind of luck can a pair of tights bring? Bordering on the “lucky you” of Lucky Brand, are we? Oh, and what happened to the egg shaped box they used to come in? I didn’t see any of those with their new packaging. How is the “eggs” of L’eggs even relevant now?

In understanding my distaste for L’eggs rebranding, here are some things to consider when thinking about rebranding (after all it’s not all about generating awesome, new creative, but having a good reason for it, too).

  1. Understand who your current demographic is and what their perceptions of your current branding are (ie: market research). If you fail to research current public opinion, you may find yourself in a conundrum reminiscent of Old Coke vs New Coke. Maybe people love you just the way you were. This I believe is the downfall of the new L’eggs in replacing that classic slogan.
  2. If in step 1 you find that perceptions are not what you’d hoped, decide what you want your end users to get from your brand. Think Domino’s recent overhaul due to some unsavory research findings; they realized they needed people to not think of terrible quality when thinking of them.
  3.  Generate new concepts based on your decision to refresh the interest of your current demographic or target a new one.
  4.  Take your concepts to research.
  5. Launch the selected (based on findings in research) campaign… and pray.
  6. Research, yes again. You need to evaluate the outcomes of your campaign, and unfortunately it is this step that we sometimes so easily forget.

Now don’t think I’m being harsh on L’eggs and tell me what rebranding in the past has really had you all worked up. I can’t be the only one that finds it hard to let go of those old slogans.