Archive for the 'Break-through advertising' Category

Page 2 of 3

areinbolz

Why closed loop marketing is (often) an illusion

Be honest: When did you last look at the statistics for your website? While we’re on the subject, how often do you check the usage data for your e-detailings? Your answer may well be once – directly after each campaign.

Statistics are often delivered proudly by IT departments in the form of a 256-page PowerPoint epic. They might be perfect material for a doctorate on web statistics, but they are more of a hindrance than a help when it comes to making fast tactical decisions during the cut and thrust of day-to-day business.

The problem doesn’t end there. Modern closed loop marketing systems integrate seamlessly with your CRM and write data, read data, precisely down to individual doctor or salesman. This creates a treasure trove of information – in theory at least.

Think about it: What data are you permitted to store in your country? What about Europe or South America? And what data are you actually storing? Issues which busy company lawyers for months on end in some countries may be completely unfathomable for global brand teams.

Even after the data has finally been collated, what is its tangible contribution to marketing efforts? Though the question “How much information can we gain?” is often at the forefront of system selection deliberations, “How can we quickly use the information collated?” is a far more important issue. Despite the fact that the automatic, near-real-time processing of data for digital media applications should really no longer be a problem in this day and age, data analysis is almost always a major stumbling block.

To compound this, modern systems are often found wanting when it comes to readability. What is important is that data is relevant and comes from the marketer’s perspective. The data used does not even need to be harvested from the website alone – or indeed the e-detailing campaign itself. Sensibly structured information offers a solid foundation for sound decisions, and can also include data gleaned from the corporate network (e.g. sales development), external sources or even news. A cockpit which brings together all these elements enables brand managers to keep an eye on all key aspects. It doesn’t have to be as random – or bewildering – as the design chosen by Sprint , but can still be bright and engaging. By turning data into insights, you too can close the loop to your advantage.


This (sketched) dashboard shows the brand manager key information at a glance: messages, the number of customers they are reaching and the most popular slides in their e-detailing.

vzabrotta

Delete the “and”: Positioning is all about making difficult decisions

Many years ago (more than I care to count), I was given a copy of the book Positioning: The Battle For Your Mind by Al Ries and Jack Trout.  At first, I thought this was some type of new scientific suspense novel. “Why are they fighting for my mind and what are they going to do with it,” I thought to myself. But upon actually reading this 200+ page book, I found a treasure trove of insight and understanding that I continue to apply to my job almost daily. Of course, we are talking about brand positioning and how we want our product to be viewed by our target audience in relation to our competition. And while that seems like a relatively simple proposition, what has evolved (or devolved, as the case may be) has complicated an otherwise empiric concept.

In my straight-forward mind, a brand positioning can and should be able to be expressed as a very brief, 2-3 word statement. I think of these as not just the “elevator speech” we sometimes challenge ourselves to develop and practice for our sales forces, but the kind of thing you say as you pass your target audience going into or out of that very same elevator. Yep – it can and should be that brief and quick. Once a day. More powerful. More effective. Greater safety. Less of this.  More of that. You get the idea.

But what has happened in the crazy world of pharma marketing is that we clutter it all up.  We have a brand unique selling proposition, a brand essence, and a brand commitment. They are all important, all inter-relate, and many times are inconsistently and erroneously applied to the work that occurs between agencies and their clients. We have different processes and formats for developing and displaying these tools. And we constantly force square pegs into round holes by making new hybrids in an effort to satisfy both clients and agencies so everyone can be satisfied and go home with a smile. Pure positioning has gotten weaker and weaker as the years have rolled by.  And I would suggest it is time for some old-fashioned thinking.

If you have not yet read the aforementioned book by Trout and Ries, you are missing out. Even though the examples are quite dated (it was written in 1981), the principles and concepts are not. Think of brand(s) you manage as you sift through this easy read. I have been in the industry for almost 30 years, and I still pull that book off my shelf (when people are nice enough to return it after borrowing it) and draw examples and thoughts from it. Truly a landmark read for anyone entrusted with marketing a brand.

I have often told members of my teams that positioning is all about making difficult decisions.  If you aren’t feeling stress in this job, you are probably not doing it right. No….everyone can’t be right.  No…..everyone can’t be happy.  No….you can’t focus on three things about your product.  NO….you can’t have an “and” in your positioning.  And yes….some of you will be disappointed, frustrated, and sad.  Like a colleague once told me….if an arrow had two points, it will never penetrate the target as well as a single pointed arrow.  And so it goes with positioning.

That is not to say you still can’t have your various sundry of brand-ware tools to fill out your brand book and PowerPoint slides. But among them, ensure your positioning can be declared as a simple 2-3 word statement.  There is nothing more powerful or able to serve as a guiding light for your brand than a simple, clear, concise axiom that embodies your reason for existing on Earth.  Don’t complicate-it-up. Make it your mantra. Yell it down the halls at work in the middle of the day (or when your boss is not there). Force your teams (and yes, that includes trusted agency partners) to make the difficult decisions that lead to THE most important thing you will ever do for your brand. To plagiarize from the folks who make A-1 Steak Sauce, “yeah…it’s that important”.

Great….so hopefully we are on the same page when it comes to positioning.  Remember the old adage/acronym of KISS – keep it simple, stupid! But how do we get there? Catch me next month when I will throw out a few thoughts and ideas on what to do….and what NOT to do….to get to positioning nirvana.  Until then….what challenges have you faced when developing brand positioning? Have any horror stories?  Amazing successes? Don’t be shy….shout ‘em out!

mtscott

Wayfinding: Designing information for great customer experiences

Ads are designed, packages are designed, cars and buildings are designed, cities and maps are designed. What many people don’t know is that information is designed, and just how it helps us find out way.

What’s the point of design? Basically, it’s to let the user know what to do next. Yep, all of the items listed above convey brands and emotions, but as I’ve said elsewhere, brands and concern about “brand awareness” often remind me of that joke: “But enough about me! What do you think of me?”

A better question would be, “What sort of experience are you having every time you come to our site, talk to one of our representatives, use our products, try to get more information about our products, or simply try to figure out how to get reimbursement help from our company?” In part, your brand emerges from the answers to those questions. A great example of brand emerging from a retail experience—in this case, customers assembling their own custom bicycles—is shown in the experience designed for Mission Bicycle customers by Adaptive Path.

Subway maps: what do you leave out?

What do I mean by designing information and wayfinding? Well, if I dropped you in the middle of Tokyo with only the map shown, it wouldn’t be long before you’d be on your way to wherever you wanted to go.

What is it about this map that makes it so easy to follow? As Peter Morville says in Ambient Findability about a map of the London Tube, it “sacrifices reality for simplicity, presenting memorable paths, edges, districts, nodes, and landmarks.” Each subway line has its own color, and junction points are clearly identified by color, line symbol, and station number.

What’s not included is just as important as what is. Exactly how far is it from Otemachi to Shinjuku Station? I don’t know, but I know how to get there. After a day on the subway, I’d be able to estimate the time it would take between stations, even though no scale is provided. Where are the parks? Where are the fashion districts? Where can I find the latest electronics? It doesn’t matter. I can find that information in other places.

Morville notes that, “…the impact of [environmental] legibility goes beyond wayfinding; it shapes people’s image of the city. Getting lost in a city can be frustrating and scary. Frequent negative experiences hurt the city’s brand. In contrast, landmarks that combine form and function by serving as beautiful wayfinding tools can greatly enhance a city’s image.”

Errr…you were talking about customer experiences?

The next time you write anything, think of what your audience needs to know.

  • Can 5 pages of bullets be transformed into a simple chart?
  • As in the map of Tokyo, which information is better suited for other places (such as an appendix or footnote in our case)?
  • How do you simplify? For example, real subway stops are not colored oval boxes, junctions don’t have thick lines around them, and actual railway paths are not as uncomplicated as shown here. In other words, developing wayfinding tools involves making tough decisions.
  • If you have charts and graphs, are there more interesting—and elegant—ways to present them (without introducing what Edward Tufte calls “chartjunk”)?
  • How can you make your charts and graphs appealingly interactive?

You can find a nice interactive example of the effect of streaming content acquisition costs on Netflix profits here. Now imagine a similar chart portraying the effect of BMI on lipids or blood glucose, weight loss on knee load (for osteoarthritis), or family history on cancer risk. In each case, you would have to simplify some aspects of the interaction and work closely with your medical/legal teams, but the results could have great impact.

Information design is an important focus for artists and designers. But it’s an art we should all understand. Medical writers—all good writers—should be thinking of wayfinding and information design from the beginning of any project. Where does your audience want to go, and how can you help them find their way? (Special thanks to Denise Leo for inspiring this post.)

jhodroge

Overheard in the agency…

Welcome to the unofficial beginning of fall! Now that the kids are back in school and summer vacations are wrapping up, it’s the time of year when agencies typically see an increase in work and deadlines. During the race to meet our deadlines, as you walk around our agency, you still might hear a few conversations about TV advertisements that catch our attention. Oftentimes, we’re inspired – or not, as the case may be – by what we see and hear.

Here’s what we’re talking about…

1. Old Spice: The man your man could smell like

What the conversation is about: How funny this commercial is and how well it uses social media. Of course we also are thinking about how we might be able to incorporate social media in pharma advertising.

2. Pepsi vs Coke 2.0 remake of a 1995 commercial:

What the conversation is about: How easy Pepsi makes it look to bring an old commercial into today’s context.

3. Progressive Insurance commercials

What the conversation is about: How much is too much? Is anyone else to the point that they hate Flo?

4. Nike Inspirational commercial

What are people saying: Put simply, nice.

5. Droid2 by Motorola, the next generation of does

What people are saying: Nice use of graphics in the hands.  But does the phone really do what it says?

What inspires you? Do you have a favorite commercial or advertisement? Share your thoughts with us!

vzabrotta

Is Knott’s Berry Farm really that good??

That is what was asked of people in an experiment designed to explore the power of the right brain when making decisions. It came from a book I recently read entitled How We Decide by Jonah Lehrer. The book is written in much the same style as Malcolm Gladwell and Daniel Goleman – meaning it is chock full of scientific anecdotes that accompany more of a laypersons explanation on how to relate the findings to everyday life.

When I read these books, I try to process them through the lens of my role as an advertiser. I seek to apply the stories and learning to the work our teams at GSW Worldwide experience on an almost daily basis. In the case of this particular book, a passage caught my eye that really resonated. It had to do with how we justify the decisions people make and how asking them to justify those decisions is much more difficult than one might think. Think of it….making a decision about whether you like option A or option B – and then not being able to REALLY tell someone why you picked one versus the other. Seems improbable. Likely impossible – right? Here’s how Lehrer described decision making in the world of taste testing jams….

Timothy Wilson, a psychologist at the University of Virginia, replicated a taste test previously performed by Consumers Reports. From the CR report, he selected those jams that were ranked as the first, eleventh, twenty-fourth, thirty-second, and forty-fourth best tasting jams. He then asked college students to rank these jams for preference (with no guidelines) and much to no one’s surprise, the statistical correlation between the two rankings was impressive. The order pretty much confirmed what CR had found. It seems that when asked to judge jams, we are all natural experts.

Then Wilson went on to repeat the same test with different students, this time asking them why they preferred one jam over another. As they tasted the different jams, they were required to fill out questionnaires forcing them to analyze their first impressions – to consciously explain their otherwise impulsive preferences. The result? Would you believe that the statistical correlation plummeted to the point of there being no connection between the CR report and this second test. In fact, the jam that was judged worst by Consumers Reports, was now judged to be the best!

Lehrer explained that forcing people to explain why they prefer one brand over another makes them analyze their first impressions, to consciously examine their impulsive preferences. This extra analysis alters their judgment – to the point of almost reversing the preference order. The author suggests that “thinking too much” causes us to focus on our rational brain. And that when we do this, we cut off the wisdom of our emotions which are better at judging preferences. In essence, you lose your ability to know what you really want. And in case you think this experiment might be flawed, or that jams taste testing is an unusual, unqualified stimuli, the author provides a few additional supporting experiments using different methods to test the theory. All of which support the central theme that we are at our best when we accept our emotional judgment vs rationalizing our preferences.

So…think about all those times you spent in conference rooms judging creative concepts, messages, or positioning. Remember when you were behind the glass in research, asking respondents to provide their thoughts on why they selected one creative concept over another. Are we forcing them, as Wilson suggests, to warp their preference? Are we really getting the information and insight we need to enhance our advertising stimuli? And more important, is there a way to get at what we need as advertisers without triggering that negative process? Or is all this a bunch of baloney? What do you think? What has your experience been?

If nothing else, might I suggest you read How We Decide and process it through our industry and the way we market research and think about brands, campaigns, etc. I think you will find it to be interesting, to say the least. Just don’t read it when you are shopping for jam!

jdoyle

Five paths to success in global marketing

Launching and building a global brand requires brand managers with special skill sets. More than just being able to adjust and work in different time zones global strategic brand managers must be able to understand and embrace different cultures, and be eager and willing to help create the conditions for success for the brand and their regional marketing colleagues. As more Pharma/Biotech and Medical Device brands are becoming global brands, how can we help create a distinctive and impactful brand that has a consistent brand image worldwide?

After collaborating with several different global brand managers – some more successful than others – I’ve seen five distinct paths they have taken to help them achieve their goals.

  1. Respect – Just like the old song says “R-E-S-P-E-C-T, you don’t know what it means to me”, people respond much better when they feel they are being respected. “It’s different in my country (or region)” is a phrase I’ve heard from regional or country marketing managers in every engagement in which I’ve been involved. And the truth is, YES it is different! Different cultures, regulations, even different brand labels are bound to impact consistency for the brand. But the successful global brand managers engage their regional colleagues, understand and respect their markets uniqueness, and digs deeply for areas of commonality.
  2. Collaboration – Successful global brand managers instinctively collaborate with their regional marketing colleagues. They involve them “early and often” in brand planning. A useful tool is to have all regions participate in a situation analysis, outlining their target audiences, markets, competition and perform a SWOT analysis on the brand. More often than not it becomes apparent that great areas of similarity exist in different markets.  But collaboration cannot stop there.  It must continue, giving regional colleagues an equal say in positioning, and participating in the building of the brand imagery. Having them participate in the market research of positioning, messages and brand concepts in their regions provides them the assurances that the ultimate brand imagery and messages will be successful in their particular market.
  3. Reseach – Global brand managers must conduct in-depth market research on the brand in the appropriate regional/country markets. Specific market conditions research (sales, shares, target audience perceptions, competitive intel) will be brought by regional marketing personnel to the situation analysis meetings, but successful global marketers will conduct the research needed to validate brand development activities, and to measure their success.
  4. Communication – This must be an ongoing process that allows for a two-way communication between global and regional marketing. Successful global brand managers have regularly scheduled telecons, WebEx’s, etc. where they share information with their regional colleagues on such subjects as:  “What is global marketing doing to further develop the brand or programs to support it?” “How is the launch of the brand going in a particular market?” “What are the areas of success… or what are the challenges the brand is facing as it is being rolled out?”  Savvy global brand managers schedule meetings with their regional colleagues before or after market global Congresses or Conferences when they will all be together in a given city. And web-based technology is providing us tools to provide regional colleagues marketing material content and the instantaneous context for these materials… but this will be a subject for a future web post!
  5. Resourcefulness – I almost titled this one “Resources”, but then I quickly remembered that I’ve never worked with a global manager who felt that they had the resources necessary to fully capitalize the situation at hand! But the successful ones I’ve worked with understood how to be resourceful with the assets they have, and to achieve great things. They see themselves as a great “lever arm” able to apply pressure strategically to achieve their goals.

And those of us who had the pleasure of studying physics most likely came across that famous quote by Archimedes: “Give me a lever long enough and a place to stand and I can move the earth.” Successful global brand managers indeed give the world of brand marketing a jolt!

leigh.householder

Car industry proves advertisers can innovate – when they have to

One of the toughest blows TV and print publications took during the recession was doled out by Detroit. As new car sales plummeted, so did advertising dollars. The Big Three alone slashed their budgets by almost half between 2004 and the height of the downturn in 2008.

Now they’re coming back. Selling more cars, building up budgets, and – importantly – trying a lot of new ways to connect with consumers. In fact, I’d argue that some of the best advertising out there today is from car companies. And, interestingly, little of it looks like traditional advertising.

It started in 2009 with Ford’s Fiesta Movement, the investment that gave 100 bloggers and other “culture creators” a car for six months and asked them to complete a different mission every month.  The effects of the campaign were remarkable. Fiesta got 6.5 million YouTube views and 50,000 requests for information about the car—virtually none from people who already had a Ford in the garage. Ford sold 10,000 units in the first six days of sales.

Single Mom Blogger Alaina Sheer in her custom Fiesta, taking off on one of her first Fiesta Movement missions

That same year, Prius launched its beautiful Harmony campaign – the TV and print ads we couldn’t help but smile at.

This year, Kia launched the addictive sock money music video – earning millions of social media clicks. Then, Toyota trumped them with them by re-imagining the mini van as a Swagger Wagon. Over 10 million people have clicked their agreement.

But the most break-through ad of all – the one our industry can’t seem to stop talking about? Toyota’s surprise. Tearing a page from Home Depot and Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, Toyota takes us into the life of a cake maker trying to run her business without a car. They show us her friends, her day, her struggles. And, just when we are as about attached as America gets, they give her a car. Not a dry eye in the living room.

What’s different about these commercials than everything else we see on TV? They’re not strictly advertising. Instead of selling us, they’re engaging us. With delight, with entertainment, with the voice of our peers.

A similar challenge is ahead for pharma as we enter an era of generics and industry reform. What will our industry do to change everything?

mtscott

Being better is a strategy for failure (and brands are a relic)

I have a Rio Cali mp3 player. Have had it since 2004. It had a whopping 256 MB capacity, and an optional 500 MB SD card brought it to ¾ GB. But the sound was great, and it held enough songs for running. My little Cali used a single AAA battery, ran forever, and had flash memory. I sweated on it, dropped it (more than a few times)—but the only thing that could do it in was my change to a 64-bit operating system.

Why? No drivers, no support.

Why was the iPod everywhere?

It seems Rio had long ago been eclipsed by the iPod, which first came out in 2001. There were 5GB players 2 years before the iPod, like the PJB-100. There were indestructible little flash-drive players like my Rio Cali. But they all tried to be “better” in some way. More and more memory. Smaller and smaller form factor. Radios. Voice recorders.

I despised the iPod. Its hard drive made it useless for running. Its proprietary battery meant I might as well buy a new one every year. It was pricey relative to the competition. As someone who researches and obsesses over every technology purchase, it made no sense to me. But there it was, everywhere.

Experience as strategy

I learned why from the best marketing book of the past 5 years—Adaptive Path’s Subject to Change: Creating Great Products & Services for an Uncertain World. In it you’ll learn that being the best is not a strategy.  That way of thinking hearkens back to the world of industry when “businesses sought technology, features, and optimizations to maintain or increase an advantage over their competitors. But the value of investing solely in those things has reached an end.”

So what takes the place of being better? Experience as strategy. Does your product mesh with “the way people move through their lives”? Before the iPod, how did people get songs on an mp3 player? They ripped them from CDs and used a program to convert and move them to the player. Apple’s genius was in empathizing with its users. What did they want?

As Subject to Change puts it, “Apple clearly had an experience strategy for the iPod from the outset: all your music, any time, anywhere…In fulfilling this goal, Apple’s genius wasn’t the design of form or interface, but in the design of the entire system that supports the media consumer.” They placed functionality across the system where it was appropriate: the iPod let you play music, iTunes let you browse and add audio, and the Music Store let you buy media. No extraneous functionality on the iPod—no radio (clashes with the strategy of your media), no voice recording (who uses that?), and no wifi until iPod Touch (when it made sense with the strategy of your media, anywhere).

Not about brand

The iPod and its experience brought Apple back into the limelight. It was not that much of a “brand”—best remembered for its breakthrough 1980s ads from 20 years prior.

Remember the Apple Newton? It made the mistake of stuffing unnecessary features into a large form factor. The inventor of the Palm Pilot, on the other hand, carried a block of wood that matched the size of his colleagues’ shirt pockets. When anyone suggested new features, he challenged them: where would it go on this block of wood? Again, the thought was always about how people moved through their lives with the device.

Adaptive Path makes it clear that an experience strategy is not a brand strategy. Brand begins with the company: here are our values, here are our attributes, and here’s how we project them to consumers. Brand, they say, is rooted in 19th- and 20th-century manufacturing of making and selling products. Brand is still important; however, “products aren’t interesting in and of themselves, but only as interfaces to larger systems.” Experience strategy is “about contributing to a desirable experience, helping people accomplish what they want to get done.”

So the next time you think about what you or your client wishes to project to a consumer, turn it around. Empathize! First of all, who cares what you want to project? Second, will you get far if you view people as consumers (ie, a simple means to make a profit)? What are your customer’s motivations and behaviors? What context do they live in? What do they want to accomplish today? How can you design an experience that will help them get it done? How can you help them move through their lives a little more gracefully?

leigh.householder

Shareworthy: Four “can’t miss” clicks

(Co-published at WhatsYourDigitaliQ.com)

My inbox was overflowing last week with great finds from my colleagues and friends. Here are four of the best to start the week:

Facebook: The Movie

This is how it happens: You invent something amazing. You fight along the way. You get a little rich, a little too fast and act like a fool with your money. You get everything figured out. And, just then – they make a movie about your bumpy road to getting there. The Apple founders had Pirates of Silicon Valley and now the original Facebook friends have The Social Network.

The movie itself isn’t the big deal, though; it’s the trailer. Check it out – a seamless blend of entertainment and advertisement; an excellent example of a new generation of ads that are at once more native and more culturally resonant:

If you’re following Facebook trends, also check out As Facebook Users Die, Ghosts Reach Out from this weekend’s NYTimes. Incredible new challenges for social networks to address.

(Thanks to Tim Ryan)

An Empathetic Website

How many healthcare websites have you visited with patient testimonials? 50? 100? And, how many of those have felt real and human to you (vs. edited within an inch of their lives)? I’m guessing it’s a pretty tiny number.

MSLivingWell is one website that really held the line – the stories there are delivered in a truly creative way and are so real and honest that you get caught up in them. Click Watch Carrole’s Story on the right for a great example.

(Thanks to Sean Cowan)

New Knowledge About Nurses

Our well-financed friends over at Manhattan Research just released another fantastic report: Taking the Pulse Nurses. One of their analysts – Maureen Malloy – wrote a summary for MedAdNews.

A couple of highlights:

  • More than 80% of online nurses direct patients to health-related websites for additional information
  • Additionally, nurses impact patient healthcare decisions. A majority of online nurses report that they are influential over their patients’ adherence to treatment regimens
  • The majority of nurses online for professional purposes use the Internet multiple times throughout the workday, with the uptake of smart mobile devices fostering an “always on” culture in the medical field
  • Nearly 90% of online nurses have visited a pharmaceutical, biotech, or device corporate or product Website in the past year, with Merck and GlaxoSmithKline leading the pack in terms of visitation

Today, few healthcare and pharma websites contain nurse-specific content. Is it time for that to change?

(Thanks to Tyler Ransburg)

AstraZeneca TWEETS

In the category of “I didn’t know we could do that!” comes this great find from fellow blogger Jon Richman. In his mini-white paper 10 Things I’d Like to Start Hearing About Pharma Social Media, Jon shares this very cool search and response Twitter campaign by AstraZenaca:

The brand listens for people with complaints about its products and then directs them to its customer service line to find help. Great way to show you’re listening and find new ways to use big investments (like a call center)

(Thanks to Dawn Marinacci)

edavis

Philosophies Rule.

“If you convince me you love dogs, I’ll let you feed mine.”
Lee Clow, TBWA/Chiat Day

Dogs Rule —Two words.

A simple mission statement, embodied in a tag line.

A brand philosophy derived from passion.

When you communicate a brand philosophy to your customers, you are inviting them to share your beliefs. Shared beliefs help to convert skeptics into adopters, and can strengthen bonds between consumers and brands.

The funny thing is that these beliefs, like ‘Dogs Rule’, rarely involve your product or service. They are simply the moment where consumers and brands’ ideals meet.

However, beliefs are only as valid as the actions behind them. When corporate or brand actions don’t match up with the ethos defined in the advertising space, consumer trust is broken.

Since 2005, Pedigree has put the ethos “Dogs Rule” into definitive action by encouraging their employees to bring their dogs to work, by moving offices to pet-friendly locations, and by creating the Pedigree Adoption Drive Foundation. This organization supports 3,500 dog shelters across the US and encourages dog adoptions and has raised over $3.5 million so far.

It took TBWA/Chiat Day to convince Pedigree that a simple philosophy based in human truth could turn dog lovers into Pedigree lovers.

“Dog food brands were missing the emotional high ground,” Clow says. Ads focused on product shots and either fell into cartoon-like expressions of dogs or scientific explanations of how the food benefited canine health. None talked about what makes dogs and their relationships with their owners special. “We told them, ‘People who have dogs love their dogs. Why wouldn’t you be a brand that loves dogs and have it motivate everything you do?”

Currently, Kibbles’n’Bits is running very product-focused ads that repeatedly stress how much dogs love Kibbles’n’Bits. I don’t know about you, but dogs aren’t the most persnickety eaters on the planet – and how do I know they truly love Kibbles’n’Bits? Did they focus group this? Taste testing? Did they validate all breeds or just a select few? Purebreds? Mongrels? Old dogs vs. young dogs? Sadly, Kibbles’n’Bits is asking me to believe in nothing more than how awesome their dog food is.

You may ask, what does this have to do with pharmaceutical or health and wellness brands?

Stand for something beyond what your product does on a surface level. Be bold, but honest. Your brand needn’t promise the moon (I’m sure the FDA would have something to say about that.)

So, put a stake in the ground. And live it every day.

Dogs Rule.

Oh, and Cancer Sucks.